I can vouch for that statement, from my own personal experience. If you're working with large amounts of data, the lag is quite unacceptable.
-----Original Message----- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claus Wahlers Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:00 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides > On a high quality machine, WS can take 400ms, but on a slower > machine it can take 3-10 seconds for a single call and the larger > the data exchanged, the worse it gets. Not good. Aren't you exaggerating a bit here? Can you give a real world example of a SOAP XML that takes 400ms to parse/consume on a high end machine? I mean, we're talking Flash Player 9, aren't we? Cheers, Claus. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
