RE: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides

[Ted Patrick]

No I am not exaggerating.   Run a Web Services call on my mothers old Dell and you can count the seconds. When AMF was first added to Flash Player 6, the primary reason was performance on slow machines. AMF was much faster then and it remains the case. XML parsing performance decays non-linearly on slower machines and with larger xml documents.   Keep me honest Claus!   Ted Patrick Flex Evangelist Adobe Systems Incorporated         From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Claus Wahlers Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:00 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Junk E-Mail - LOW] [flexcoders] Re: Choice of backend systems - which provides   > On a high quality machine, WS can take 400ms, but on a slower > machine it can take 3-10 seconds for a single call and the larger > the data exchanged, the worse it gets. Not good. Aren't you exaggerating a bit here? Can you give a real world example of a SOAP XML that takes 400ms to parse/consume on a high end machine? I mean, we're talking Flash Player 9, aren't we? Cheers, Claus. __._,_.___ -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___