What is the issue with "smaller swf output file sizes"?
If you use link-report and load-externs, you can optimize swf size for
both the modules and the main app without any issues.
Just out of curiosity, have you filed any bugs regarding the other
issues you've encountered? (Cross-SWF font access is a problem at the
player level, but the other stuff is all fixable.)
-rg
________________________________
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjorn Schultheiss
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 7:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Modules at 360Flex conference
Shaun,
Smaller Swf output file sizes,
Module support within the mx framework,
Module support within Cairngorm,
Issues with Viewstacks and Binding,
Embedding Fonts,
I think there are a couple more as well.
Bjorn
On 08/03/2007, at 1:11 PM, shaun wrote:
Bjorn Schultheiss wrote:
> Hey Alex,
>
> After your experience with modules do you believe it
was the correct
> decision to include it in 2.01 as opposed to waiting
for 3.0?
! > Over here we just refactored away from modules to
the mon! olithic ria
> because of outstanding issues..
>
What are the outstanding issues?
cheers,
- shaun
