I hope this isn't taken with as some sort of corporate shill for my employer, as it's honestly not my intent, but Dave Wolf, Vice President of Consulting at Cynergy Systems, gives an excellent summary as to why Silverlight is a phenomenally important announcement to the RIA industry and why it's not just some "copycat Flash" competitor. If you're looking for a balanced view of Silverlight's effect, check out his latest blog entry:
http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/davewolf?entry=wake_up_and_see_the Regards, Dave Carabetta. Cynergy Systems, Inc. On 4/18/07, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its an annoyance of mine aswell. I'm confused as to why .NET remoting was dropped from Flash/Flex (haven't yet seen FLASH CS3 and whether its back but yeah, no idea and all i can say is Mark's got his head screwed on right and he can help with WebORB in that regard. Actually the Flex Builder integration is quite stunning I must say, it left both Andrew Shorten & I drooling @ Feb Seattle Flex UG) That so sounded like a plug didn't it :) hehe. (Sorry it wasn't meant to be) On 18 Apr 2007 07:38:08 -0700, mvbaffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been working with Flex since its alpha version. Before the > release version was avaiable I had an application with AMFPHP ready. > That is I really love Flex and i have been working with it since it's > 1.5 version. > > But I am a .NET developer, I have a huge legacy in .NET Framework 2.0 > and 1.1. I don't know why Adobe, up to this moment, is maintaining > exclusive focus on Java. There are a lot of .NET developers that > would like to have a server framework developed directly from Adobe. > > Applications are not only Client, they need a strong and consistent > server Framework. I beleive that if Adobe maintains its exclusive > focus on java it will loose, very soon a good number of .NET > developers. > > Communications Foundations is really good and it will be better very > soon. And it's price is very good, it is free !!!!! > > I am still working on the Microsoft framework. But I beleive that WPF > and SilverLight can be very soon a real competitive alternative. > > Marcus Baffa > NOVA Consulting > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Peter > Demling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Version 1 of Microsoft products have historically been slow, > > unapologizing in their copycat nature, and hampered by large numbers > > of major bugs and gaps in functionality. > > > > However, their astronomical cash reserves and relentless commitment > to > > establish market share has almost always led to vastly improved > > products in version 2 and beyond. So of course, Silverlight is no > > match for Flex - right now. But if Microsoft sustains its > commitment, > > it's not a question of *if* it could be "almost as good" as Flex - > > just a matter of when. > > > > I don't say this as a criticism of Microsoft (I use several of their > > products daily and love them), but rather to point out that they are > > more of a market force than a true software company - and so the > > relative success of Silverlight (or any other MS offering) is > > pre-ordained, so long as they decide that's what they want to do - > > it's independent of the present quality of the actual product. > > > > -Peter Demling > > Lexington, MA > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Scott Barnes" <scott.barnes@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Claus, > > > > > > Yup, so that's why FLEX does have its unique offering vs > SilverLight and > > > once developers & designers unsubscribe from the notion it's > a "Flash > > > Killer" and do more of what you are doing (exploring it's upcoming > > release) > > > you'll decide on what you think it's merits are vs aren't. It's > > early days > > > yet, so wouldn't worry to much about it folks ;) just keep an > open mind > > > should you want to take it for a test-run post MIX07 :) > > > > > > WPF & SilverLight are going to have interesting prospects just > like > > Apollo > > > and FLEX will have it's own, I think the two will do different > > things for > > > different people. Keep fingers in all barrels I'd say :) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17 Apr 2007 03:30:22 -0700, Claus Wahlers <claus@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you read FUD crap, ignore it on both sides and just be > opened > > to the > > > > > idea that theres yet another channel of delivery in rich > interactive > > > > > applications. > > > > > > > > Reading through the Silverlight docs, XAML looks to me like > some weird > > > > kind of microsoftified SVG, spiced up with MP3 and WM codecs. > I'm > > still > > > > searching but so far i couldn't find anything close to what Flex > > offers > > > > (what i found are some barely working and butt ugly component > > > > experiments). I'd guess that Silverlight will get some video > market > > > > share, but it has a long way to go to enter the RIA market. My 2 > > centavos. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Claus. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > claus wahlers > > > > côdeazur brasil > > > > http://codeazur.com.br/ > > > > http://wahlers.com.br/claus/blog/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Scott Barnes > > > http://www.mossyblog.com > > > > > > > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com
