i have to say, if your entire application is currently in one mxml file- i'm betting it's not a 'huge' application by any means- if that's the case and you want to organize your code into a framework of some sort, i would put my money on puremvc, i've been down that road and cairngorm was way overkill for what i was trying to do- you can be up to speed on the puremvc framework in less time than cairngorm.
not trying to start a puremvc vs cairngorm discussion in any way- but in my experience it was easier implementing puremvc framework into my small application than cairngorm. On 10/25/07, Jon Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 25, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Jon Bradley wrote: > > Even then... I believe it should be noted that Cairngorm is more than just > an MVC architecture. There are a variety of patterns involved in using the > framework, not the least of which is MVC. > > Even then, i don't think it really has a fully qualified MVC pattern > because there are no specific guidelines on how Views are handled, aside > from data binding to the model. I might be mistaken on this interpretation, > but that's how I see it in my usage of the framework. > > > Jeez i must be slow today. Next up... see how many times I can say "Even > then..." in the same email. > Even then...i'll still probably do it. > > :) > > - j > > >
