Robert McGwier wrote: >Frank and I are at GnuRadio Hackfest. I doubt anyone who knows us would >categorize us as anything but techno-geeks. We are constantly looking >at the lastest technology (we are about to have an OFDM system running >in GnuRadio for example) that could be of benefit to amateur radio in >particular and communications in general. That said, though we both >support this decision, we are die hard CW users. Almost without >exception, when we sit down in front of a radio in either of our >homes, the first thing either of us touches is the paddle. > >That said, I believe the FCC has done a thing they think will help save >amateur radio. That they would attempt this is surprising since they >could have just as easily made everyone do 20 wpm and killed the hobby >for sure and then auctioned off the spectrum. I hope they are right and >this succeeds. We must stop having our population grow one year older >per year. This is a prescription for utter disaster. The other >prescription for disaster is to sit on our backsides and fail to recruit >new people, as many as we can that are under 30 years old, into our >hobby. Software Radio, Cognitive Radio, and other high tech toys are >good tools to use to recruit interesting your people. USE THEM. > >It is up to each of us in the US to use this opportunity to do all we >can do for our hobby. > >May 2007 be a great year for Software Radio in particular and amateur >radio in general. > >Bob >N4HY > > > >
Amen and verily. My son is licensed ("codeless Tech") and would have almost certainly learned the code in ages past. Five minutes of talk with him would convince any of us of that. If we can't interest _him_ in the code (and, believe me, I know I couldn't), then it's just a foregone conclusion that a code requirement is doing more harm than good. Most of his friends don't even have Codeless Techs. They're just the sort we used to get as a matter of course. They find the whole code thing incomprehensible. I can't even start the conversation. There's lots of competition for tomorrow's hams out there we didn't use to have, such as computers and the internet, that require no licensing at all. Competition where meaningful participation is nearly immediate and often very gratifying from the start. Where expertise can grow gradually, at one's own rate. Some may talk about "dumbing down," but the reality is, we're in competition with stuff that's a lot easier to get involved in. For any hobby, even one with a service aspect attached, we all want regular feedback. But, in the amateur service, that feedback has been too long delayed. Even without the code standing in the way, it's not going to be easy, because we still need an exam-based hobby and service. But, it's much better now that it was. We can go for 15 year olds, but also for 30 year olds in a way we just couldn't before. Spread the word. The code (as a requirement) is dead, long live amateur radio. Larry WO0Z PS, I think _after_ they're in it a while, they'll get motivated to learn code. It is, of course, intensely practical for much of what we like to do. But, today, that needs to be something that becomes clear after a real, personal understanding of how propagation and radio really work. _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com