Bob, yes, I did need to redo an image reject calibration. But after that, the result was as stated.
73 de Joe - AB1DO Bob N4HY wrote: > Are you guys saying that you did not need to change the IQ balance > settings at all? Amazing. > > Bob > N4HY > > > Joe - AB1DO wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> fascinating. I tried it here also and indeed the hump is all but gone >> using the RS 270-054 on line-in. Now I always thought that only a high >> spec audio isolator (as in handles way above audible frequencies well) >> would work on the input given the I/Q spectrum is about 90kHz wide at a >> sampling rate of 96kb/s (I am using the Delta-44). But I closely compared >> the panadapter with and without the isolator and I see no difference >> other than the DC hump. What am I missing? >> >> 73 de Joe - AB1DO _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
