What is so different with 1.16.1 compared to 1.17.0 ??
With 1.17.0 and SVN > 2497 there are no problems at all with firmware
1.3.0.0.
I run all HTRX tests, RX (filter, level, image), TX (filter, image,
carrier), RX2 (level, image), all bands passed in the first run!
73, Hans, DL2MDQ.
Neal Campbell schrieb:
If the vendor specifies the steps for migration, it is the defined
migration path for a successful upgrade. It might not make a lot of
sense if you are not directly involved in the release (I think we all
have sometimes scratched our heads on instructions from every vendor
we deal with). If the steps are so onerous that it inflicts a lot of
customer pain, then the vendor has made a mistake but I don't think
thats the situation here.
The great news if that the previous software is so good that if the
steps are onerous, people can stay with 1.14.1.
I had no issues (except the PA checksum one) when following their
instructions but I might be lucky.
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux
(540) 242 0911
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Try Spot for OS X, the intelligent DXCluster Client at
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com - $15.99
-------------------------------------------------
For a great dog book, visit www.abrohamneal.com
-------------------------------------------------
See the FlexRadio Systems Flex-5000a in
action at www.flex-videos.com
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Excellent! Yes, a "clean" or default database with no changes is
absolutely necessary for the calibration procedures.
That certainly sounds broken to me. Why doesn't the software keep a set of
default values for critical parameters needed for the built-in tests? How
hard would it be to force all the settings to what they need to be for the
test, and then restart the radio using its database when done?
You can try running just the 40m image test a few times. Sometimes a
particular band within a test will fail on the first run, but will pass on a
subsequent test.
Not necessarily. I ran into that one last night. 10M kept failing the RX2
level test. Turns out it was a configuration issue which I finally figured
out but still, it seems to me that the software should be able to deal with
that internally.
Brian Lloyd
Granite Bay Montessori School 9330 Sierra College Bl
brian AT gbmontessori DOT com Roseville, CA 95661
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.791.912.8170 (fax)
PGP key ID: 12095C52A32A1B6C
PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0 CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
.
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
