On Saturday 08 December 2001 2:38 pm, you wrote:
> David Findlay wrote:
>  > Curt Olson wrote:
>  > > So for instance if you want to try Andy's YASim 747 model, and check
>  > > out his alternate (blade element-ish) approach to modeling the flight
>  > > dynamics
>  >
>  > So what exactly does blade element-ish mean? Is this sorta like a
>
> realtime
>
>  > digital wind tunnel sorta thing? Thanks,
>
> Sorta.  Blade element is a term from propeller theory, but the basic
> idea is the same.  The airframe is broken up into a bunch of "surface"
> objects, each of which gets an independant force calculation.  Since
> they're at different positions, they will have different velocities
> due to aircraft rotation or orientation.  So you get some cool stuff
> "for free" as it were: asymmetric stalls, where one wing stalls before
> the other and puts the aircraft into a nasty orientation or spin(-like
> state); or adverse yaw -- crank the ailerons hard to one side and the
> aircraft will yaw to oppose the turn due to the extra drag on the
> upward-moving airleron.
>
> Eventually (hopefully soon), this will be extended to support
> turbulence and wash effects at each surface.  There are some
> performance worries there, though, since if each surface depends on
> the wash effects of all the others you go from O(N) to O(N^2) in the
> number of surfaces.  I think it'll work, but might require some
> surgery.
>
> Actually, the coolest feature of YASim (well, the one I'm most proud
> of) isn't the low-level simulation mechanism.  It's the high level
> performance matcher/solver.  In a YASim configuration file, you simply
> ask for "a plane that weighs so much, cruises at this speed, has this
> big an engine and has an approach speed of XXX knots at NN degrees
> AoA" -- and that's what you get.  This radically reduces the amount of
> "tweaking" that needs to be done.  Climb rates tend to be right about
> where they should be, etc...  There's still lots of tweaking (or can
> be -- I haven't really tuned the existing models much), but you start
> out with a working aircraft from the very beginning.
>
> Andy


http://www.risingup.com/planespecs/info/
This site would come in handy then, if you haven't seen it yet
TTYL
J

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to