That would add about 2000 different
aircrafts
in one night to the FGFS. There should
only be
an additional FGFS file which would give
those
parameters that are not found in MSFS
files.
And that could be some default file for
most
new planes until the actual parameter
file
would be available (if
ever?).
The support for MSFS aircraft files is so
large
and there are lot of tools available. That
would
save about 1000 work years in FGFS
project.
And add about 1000 000 potential
users!?
JOJ
|
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 aircraft files? throttle1000
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 aircraft fi... Cameron Moore
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 aircraf... throttle1000
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 air... Cameron Moore
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002... throttle1000
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use F... Christian Mayer
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not u... throttle1000
- RE: [Flightgear-devel] Why n... Norman Vine
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why n... throttle1000
- RE: [Flightgear-devel] Why n... Norman Vine
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why n... throttle1000