> > I agree in general. I'd suggest the use of -fraction or somesuch > > instead of -pct if the range is 0:1, as it is for most of these > > properties currently. > > An earlier suggestion was -n for "normalized", which is probably the > most accurate (and has the advantage of brevity). Is there any > standard unit abbreviation that conflicts with that and is useful for > flight simulation?
"-n" could be mistaken for newtons, although "-nt" is also used for this. How about "-norm"? I don't know of any units in any system which could be confused with that. Paul Paul R. Deppe Veridian Engineering (formerly Calspan) Flight & Aerospace Research Group 150 North Airport Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 (716) 631-6898 (716) 631-6990 FAX [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
