Jon S. Berndt wrote: > Jim Wilson wrote: > > The bigger problem (or so it seems to me :-)) is the one Andy > > brought up. How you model stopping on a moving runway. > > This really is not a big deal after all, I think
Agreed. Inside the gear model, the problem is basically an extra addition to the relative velocities. The problem is how to represent that to the rest of the architecture without making a gooey mess. :) I'm becomming more and more convinced that the right solution is just to special case "carrier decks" rather than handle this generically. Andy -- Andrew J. Ross NextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com "Men go crazy in conflagrations. They only get better one by one." - Sting (misquoted) _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
