On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:33:03 -0500, Michael Selig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 6/18/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote: > > Martin Spott wrote: > > > "Frederic Bouvier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS. > > > > > > This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: > > > _Before_ people start modelling the Golden Gate it would be > > > tremendously useful if the empty > > > space below an object would really remain empty. > > > I already noted several weeks ago that it is not possible to taxi > > > below the new KSFO terminal building. It would be a pity if it > > > would not be possible to fly below "The Bridge" :-) > > > > I think that this is because the hit test routine looks for the most > > high polygon when searching the ground. So you can leave the space > > below the bridge empty, at a moment the routine will return a > > negative distance to ground and the fdm will conclude of a crash. > > ************************************************** > > Sounds like we need a new property: > > <detect-building-collisions type="bool">false > </detect-building-collisions> ...or out the offender in front of a judge, and in the "true" case, Saint Peter... ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
