On Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 02:23, Oliver C. wrote:
> My question is now, does it really make sense to create a work around for
> this, isn't it better to update the STL library?
> IMHO the STL makes sense, it saves space, keeps the code clean, programmers
> don't need to invent the wheel a second time and you will need the STL
> anyway so why shouldn't we use it?
I would like to use the C++ native way to get these informations!
And RedHat shipped a long time with that old gcc.
But, IMO the sense of software is not to make the sysadmin installing it more
work because of the raising requirements ...
At least not if the workaround is 5 minutes of work ...
Greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
