On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:24:05 -0400, bsupnik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin Spott wrote: > > > It would be extremely nice to have at least one single, completely > > working example that really matches the proposed spec. This would > > significantly help to understand the schema by having a means to > > cross-check what I've grasped from the idea behind the new spec. > > Until then it's really difficult to tell if the new schema actually > > delivers what I'd expect from it or not - or at least to tell if the > > schema is comprehensive enough to derive missing information. > > Agreed...and as soon as we have such a thing, we will post it! (I > would find such a thing useful too.) This stuff is still very very > new. ..a proposal: Timed entries: I see 5 (6, 7, 8) versions of KOSH (Oshkosh, Wi), yours (_do_ check it out ;o)), the 3 RL ones (KOSH outside AirVenture, KOSH-North and KOSH-South) and Dene's version of the latter 3 that I (and maybe Pigeon) will put on one or more FGLiveCD's. ;o) ..during this and the next 4 AirVenture's, KOSH loses the 2 RWYs crossing RWY09/27 and dies, the carcass is chopped into KOSH-North which gains these 2 RWYs as taxiways while KOSH-South trades taxiway Alpha for RWY 18L/36R, details at AirVenture.org/atc/ . ..any chance these _timed_ entries versions of KOSH can replace your current version of KOSH? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
