How about we just use our own system based on data from the FG prop tree. We already have the google map servers , so all we would need to do is get other people to host their own too and become controllers for different areas. For voip / text we could use a secondary app which would run on Win , Linux & Mac or develop our own.
It would save heaps of legal issues . Ok it would maybe need some fine tuning but we're all good at that here :) Justin Smithies On Monday 12 June 2006 19:06, Martin Spott wrote: > Hi Ben, > > bsupnik wrote: > > - VATSIM could require a FG-client to use their libs (under some terms) > > as conditions for network approval. I thikn that VASTIM users are > > required as part of their membership agreement with the network to only > > use "approved" clients. > > Honestly, I'm really curious to know what the _real_ driving force is > behind this protectionism. > Is this stupid arrogance ("if they want to participate, they'll have to > follow our rules - not matter if it makes sense"), simply incompetence > ("one of these bad guys out there might compromise our servers if the > protocol gets published") or do they really have to fear something if > some third party implements their protocol ? > > Anyway, if they don't want FlightGear users to participate .... does > anyone have an idea if the "FlightProject" network still is supported > by an active community ? > > http://www.flightproject.net/ > > Cheers, > Martin. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel