Hi, Durk Talsma schrieb am 07.12.2006 20:33: > If AI really remains the only change, your solution might be workable, but > the > longer we keep a branched version, the more likely it becomes that there will > be more data restructuring. If AI is the only thing needing a new data structure: Why not add these patch to the plib-branch?
Durk Talsma schrieb am 07.12.2006 19:04: > Not true: As extensively discussed on the mailing list (and agreed upon by > most developers prior to the switch), the main development effort should > focus on an OSG based flightgear in CVS HEAD, after branching off a stable > version intended for bugfixes and a possible release. > Oh, did I miss something? I remember posts with the idea, to port stable improvements / "finished" developments to the plib branch... Maik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
