On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:20, Vivian Meazza wrote: > > > > > > "Vivian Meazza" wrote: > > > > > > > What were we saying about incompletely tested and poorly > > > > > > > > > > > > ^^ > > > > > >
[Lot's a latin skipped for clarity] > > Perhaps you recall this thread: "C++ code beautifier / > Codingstandardsproposal" > > Seems to me that we are just revisiting these issues. > ...which is actually complete nonsense. Didn't I send you a preview of the latest patch, asking for a second opinion and potential MSVC issues? And now you're suggesting this patch was insufficiently tested, without mentioning this very fact? That's rather unfair, isn't it? Please accept one fact. Code breakage does happen, whether we like it or not. I certainly don't like it, and I'm not intentionally trying to break code. It has happened to me in the past that someone else broke code I worked on. I don't like, it but usually I just go, find the problem, suggest a workaround, and notify the developer breaking the code of the proposed solution. As an example, the --start-date options were broken for quite some time, and even some code submitted by "The Man" himself once upon a time broke AI taxi behavior. Did I get mad about it? I don't recall. Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
