Jon Stockill wrote: >Curtis Olson wrote: > > > >>2. In terms of who does the interfacing work, us or them. I think that >>boils down to who benefits. I suspect that the FlightGear users will >>have a bigger benefit from getting access to the vatsim world than visa >>versa. Based on what I've seen on the multiplayer servers, we might >>only add a dozen or so users to the vatsim world at any one time. So if >>we benefit more than them, we can't get too uptight about who does the >>actual work, and it probably makes sense for one of our developers to do >>the honors. >> >> > >This needs to take into account the platforms that flightgear is used >on. If it's closed source then ideally whoever produces the app is going >to need the capability to build (at the very minimum) linux, mac, and >windows binaries, since handing the source over to someone else to let >them build for their own platform isn't an option. > > > Duuuh, if anyone would have bothered to read and digest earlier emails posted, they would know that Pep Ribal already has a working relationship and agreement with the IVAO folks to interface with Flightgear and is working these issues plus many others. Instead of beating our gums and wringing our hands perhaps we should all pitch in and give him a hand.
Just my .0.02$ JW ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
