On 9/17/07, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> > I don't know whether this should be termed a good thing. Or why should
> > Linux-advocates be proud of their operating system being seen rebooting
> > on two independent instances? ;-)
>
> They would be more concerned about what was happening BEFORE the reboot.
> The fact that the system reboots only proves the fool-proofness of it,
> as the IFE system comes happily back up again and continues what it was
> doing before :)


In my case the map application hung, presumably waiting for non-existant
flight data since there was a message at one point that mapping services
were not going to be available on this flight (which I ignored and tried
anyway.)

So a reboot is something a flight attendent knows how to do and can do
quickly, versus logging in remotely, killing some application, restarting
some other application, etc. etc. :-)

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson - University of Minnesota - FlightGear Project
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to