On jeu 4 octobre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:29:54 -0700 > > Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you define it to be > > > <type>carrier</type> > > > you can define > > > <solid>Object</solid> > > > and you may define a park position > > > > > > no need to have wire and catapult > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > -- > > > Gérard > > > http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/ > > > > ah thanks ! > > I tried <type>ship<type> and <type>static<type> ... > > Didn't try carrier though... > > > > -- > > Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > so I guess my next question is , is this an option that could be added to > all demo objects ? Cheers Vivian the "Carrier" specialist could answer better than i will do.
As far i understand the "<type>carrier</type>" was developed to answer to landing and taking off on/from carrier but any model which is defined <type>carrier</type> can have the same features or less (no catapult, no wire, no speed) , like your oil platform AND only available with non flying model. Regards -- Gérard http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
