On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> Hi Maik,
>
> now as we have several tandem-rotor helicopters I would like to ask
> wheather the yaw-axis treatment of the helo flightmodel is satisfying or
> has to be polished up a little. Or if this is just up to the creator of
> such a helo how to implement better.
>
> As for the nice HUP I can get some yaw movement but only if I apply
> *full* pedal either left or right  (and the reaction is  pretty tame and
> only  when hovering/at very low speed).
> The CH47  reacts a little  "better" but has a  heavy  roll  tendency
> when  pedal is  used, strange for me as this helo is said to be very
> stable when doing tasks like logging (civil version, Columbia helicopter).
>
> Just a question what you are thinking about this :-)
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Regards
> Georg EDDW
>

Hello Georg,

You are right and probably, Maik could give us some better tuning.
However when doing the H-21 FDM i could notice that we get some diff about the 
yaw reaction, according to the values and  position of the ballast (with 
respect in any case of the CG position), and the best we get with yaw gives 
the best on the ground position, i mean the helicopter does not slide on the 
side.
I do not pretend that the H-21 is right, it is only a remark  :) .

I am working on the HUP in order to get the same result.

Cheers

-- 
GĂ©rard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to