On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:51:33 -0600 Curtis Olson wrote: > > Personally because of how close we are to finalizing the release, I'm > *really* tempted to revert to the older scenery, but I don't know what > other changes have been subsequently committed to adjust for the new > scenery.
Maybe I'm missing something here (I'm trying hard to catch up with the
current situation), but I thought it was the other way around: the
reason for the new scenery was that the old scenery was inconsistent with
the current apt.dat -- the result being that planes often started in the
grass, rather than at thresholds. Since one of the airports that happened
at was KHAF, the tutorial airport, that seemed like a pretty bad thing and
a showstopper for release, necessitating either a reversion to a very old
apt.dat, or a more up-to-date build of the default scenery, before release.
One or the other was obligatory. cf. the threads "Release issue: apt.dat
and scenery version" and "CVS: data/Airports apt.dat.gz,1.7,1.8".
Am I wrong about this?
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
