LeeE wrote: > Yup - I downloaded lots of SRTM data to play with in GRASS and > above/below +/- 60 lat it isn't there. > > There doesn't seem to be any alternative source of suitable data > either so I don't see how FG can cover the poles.
FG can cover the poles - and has been doing so for years -, but only in terms of landcover definition, not in terms of elevation. It's not realistic, but the same could be said of using the SRTM data for deserts, which change their shape all the time. I'm sure there are sources for the pole, just with the problem that we can't use them in a legal sense. Cheers, Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
