Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Dave Perry wrote:
>
>   
>> The 3D cloud appearance is much improved.  Thanks to all involved!
>> Several questions and comments.
>> 1.  At night, the emmissive seems very very bright.
>> 2.  Are you intending that the 3D cloud base should match the lowest 
>> level in the current METAR?  I just flew with a KDSM METAR using "real 
>> weather fetch"
>> (current METAR copied from ADDS:* KDSM 081954Z 10007KT 10SM BKN130 
>> OVC160 01/M03 A2964 RMK AO2 SLP047 T00111033.  * )
>>
>> This gives a broken layer at 13000 ft AGL but the 3D clouds started at 
>> 2000 AGL.
>>     
>
> Was the weather scenario set to METAR as well - one of the bugs I fixed with 
> the
> latest patch was that previously --enable-real-weather-fetch over-wrote the 
> various
> scenarios. Now, you will only get METAR if you have METAR as the scenario, as
> well as --enable-real-weather-fetch.
>
> -Stuart
>
>   
You were correct.  I had not set the weather scenario to METAR.  I ran 
fgfs once with 3D clouds and once w/o 3D clouds, both with 
real-weather-fetch and scenario METAR.  I only got 1 fps with the 3D 
clouds.  Earlier with 3D clouds, I got about 21 fps.  Also for both 2D 
and 3D clouds, the field elevation is not accounted for in applying the 
cloud base MSL height.  The METAR for these 2 runs showed broken at 011 
(translates to 1,100 ft AGL) but leaving KDSM field elevation of 957 ft 
MSL, I was in the clouds by 1100 ft MSL or only about 150 ft AGL.  Are 
we not applying the metar field elevation + metar AGL to get the cloud 
level?

Dave P.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to