Curtis Olson wrote:
> On the subject of nasal and the property system. What this gives us is the
> ability to create all kinds of specific aircraft functionality or
> functionality specific to [...]
I agree for the cases you're outlining in your statement. On the other
hand I think I understand what Alasdair is concerned about:
Taking the ground surface material into account is a 'feature', a
requirement which clearly belongs into the responsibility of the
gear-department of the FDM. Thus if Nasal hacks to circumvent FDM- or
other core-deficiencies are becoming standard in the long run, then
this development is very likely going to bite you sooner or later.
Maintaining a healthy level of distinction between core features and
add-on's is, to put it straightforward, a matter of 'education'.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
