On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:50:25 +0100, Oliver wrote in message <20110218125025.291...@gmx.net>:
> Stuart wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > I agree with Jon on this - ideally we should be pro-active about > > asking for permission, even if we don't like the answer. > > Very good points mentioned. Especially the point that this will > increase FGs appearance on some radars. However lots of people are > nowadays using Google so the debate has become public anyway. I would > to point out that besides the two results "yes" and "no" there might > be a third one worth considering which is: "No answer from the TM > holder". This might be treated the same as "yes" or "no". In case of > treating it as "yes" we should agree how to treat potential > consequences ;) > > Oliver ..that third option can easily be split in 3; 3a) Prepare to plead mercy in the courts, 3b) Depend on mercy in the courts, and 3c) Plead mercy in the courts. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
