On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:37 -0600, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > To be safest we probably ought to rename the Fokker aircraft models as F100 > and F50.
I hardly believe that's necessary. I've never heard any complaint about using the Fokker name in any flight simulator. In fact the Fokker project for MSFS does have some support from the Fokker company I believe. Also the situation for JSBSim is slightly different since it only concentrates on the Flight Dynamics part of the simulator and configuration files therefore could be misinterpreted as being accurate. If, after simulated tests, some oddity shows up and someone decides to contact the manufacturer of the particular aircraft then that pushes JSBSim right in front of the radar. So stating that the FDM is in no way endorsed or backed up by the manufacturer actually makes sense. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
