Am 15.09.11 18:12, schrieb Martin Spott: > HB-GRAL wrote: > >> I see now also some differences between OSM and "our" apt.dat [...] > > Note that OSM might be aiming at a different target, they're not > necessarily building a database which meets the specific requirements > in (simulated) aviation. > > Cheers, > Martin.
Hi Martin No, it looks like the mapping with apt.dat data is inaccurate, at least outside the United States. I checked some airports the last days. You can not say that FlightGear or X-Plane data is accurate and the rest of the mapping world is missing the "points". It does not depend on aviation or not. A lot of runways are misplaced, and I am just asking about the reason. Maybe one of the reasons is that apt.dat is based on old analog imagery, not available anymore. Cheers, Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
