Hi James Thank you very much (and Martin of course) for diving into. I am just curious how you go to replace GPC.
Cheers, Yves Am 15.10.11 17:20, schrieb James Turner: > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 15:22, HB-GRAL wrote: > >>> I think the only solution is to make GPC obsolete - either by replacing >>> GPC by something different but functional equivalent or "simply" (TM ;-) >>> by avoiding any polygon clipping in 'fgfs-construct' overall. >>> >>> Martin. >> >> Hi Martin >> >> Are there any concrete suggestions ? > > Yes, it's being actively hacked on and tested, I believe, because the clipper > is the most numerically sensitive part of the whole process, and performance > sensitive too. One candidate is being tested already, and there's other > options available, but it's really important not to regress the core > functionality, so some caution is required! > > James > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
