kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> When we're talking about MSFS and terrain i also want to mention, that
> their regular grid allowed them to use textures that allowed a seamless
> crossover on their borders. So with the right textures choosen, the
> textures matched on the borders.
Ah, well, but, as I understand, this would in summary require dozends
of different textures just to meet the requirements of simple
variations at corner areas, like:
|
B | A
|------
B B
|
C | A
-----|------
B B
>From my prspective this approach isn't flexible enough.
> http://www.x-plane.com/wp/wp-content/gallery/more-v10-landscapes/kc-10_13.jpg
I think they're just multi-texturing the transition area between two
adjacent land cover classes - which isn't _that_ simple either, because
you'll have to define carefully which land cover type pairings may
feature a transition area and which ones don't.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
