On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Michael wrote: > Personally I'd leave 3.0 for the new apt 850 support. If that's not in for > summer leave it at 2.8.
I think we need a new world scenery generation to take place to take full advantage of apt 850 support. I don't know if that's on the cards for this summer release. I disagree that we should leave 3.0.0 for apt 850 support. That's not to say that 850 support (and the implicit world scenery generation) isn't worthy of a version increment. On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Björn Kesten wrote: > If the new autogen will be included, I'm also in favor for a 3.0.0 version > numbering. The current "next" branch of git will form the basis for the summer release, so it will include all the regionalized textures, object-masking and random building work that has taken place. -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
