Durk,
I don't know: FS-X can really impress:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCj0uqeco
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCj0uqeco&feature=related>
&feature=related
Lots of wow! While we can do some, or perhaps even most of this, we can't do
it at an acceptable frame rate. (Er . can FS-X?)
We have this in FG:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/57645542/switcher.png
We have all manner of road and rail vehicles available. I'd love to get it
them into action someday.
Vivian
From: Durk Talsma [mailto:durkt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 November 2012 10:22
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend 2012...
Hi Thorsten,
On 07 Nov 2012, at 10:55, Renk Thorsten wrote:
Sorry, I don't want to talk down on the great job you guys are doing in
presenting all this, I'm just trying to understand what it is you consider
an eye-catcher. I'm just a bit mystified that somehow a feature which
dominated our screenshot contest doesn't count in this department...
No worries. :-). This is actually fairly subjective, and I'm afraid that I
didn't explain my concern too well in my initial post. The real issue is
salience, which you can describe as the subjective property of a percept to
stand out from it's environment (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salience_(neuroscience) ). So, a cool feature
that easily dominates in a screenshot contest may not be able to capture our
attention very effectively in a different context, such as the one at
FSWeekend, where visitors are usually bombarded with high quality graphics.
So, what I was actually looking for was new ways of *using* FlightGear,
within the limitations of an internet-free environment. Our lan based
multiplayer server was very effiective in the past, and in the last few
years we also had some new aircraft and/or a specific theme, or even an
internet connection, all of which served as great eye-catchers. This year
was a bit of a step back in those respects, so I found myself more often
than not reverting back to the tested and tried.
Well, yes and no - even if we're just catching up in graphics to what others
do (which in many cases we probably do, judging by screenshot googling),
isn't the fact that a scene no longer looks like 10 years behind what others
do somehow relevant? It might not act so much as catch attention than to
prevent immediate turn-aways...
Of course it is, and in many cases it does keep visitors attention a bit
longer, usually because they don't know what they're exactly looking at. :-)
Cheers,
Durk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
