Maybe another possibility is to hang in a second mac slave to built 
maclauncher/FlightGear against SDK 10.5 and target 10.5. I could spend one of 
my FGx slaves once for such, when it makes sense for the project to get 10.5 
support on intel back. Or another possibility is I try to build the official 
maclauncher out of jenkins locally here with such a setting, and when it is 
working you can put that to a separate 10.5 download. 

I would offer this work when there is some request for this, but first ... I 
would try to get atlas support back for osx when possible. I'm not able to 
compile atlas and I guess this is a really hard one for all osx versions. I 
hope that my findings with this can help the official launcher. It was always 
included with former version when I'm not wrong, and FGx doesn't support atlas 
either these days, unfortunately. (Another minority probably, but for me 
personally atlas is still one of the best maps we have, even this is a very old 
and a bit outdated project).

-Yves




Am 19.02.2013 um 02:07 schrieb ys <flightg...@sablonier.ch>:

> Hi Curt
> 
> I would not recommend to get 10.5 support back with current official jenkins 
> build. AFAIK current mac build for 10.6/7/8 works very well, supporting 10.5 
> would need heavy changes, or better, downgrading of slaves, and it is 
> definitely not worth to break things this way. I'm free to do such on a small 
> private CI, and I made a lot of noise about having 10.5 support back, but at 
> the end it's just weird and for a very small minority of fg users like me. 
> But it is documented, and everyone joining the adventure can do so ;-)
> 
> -Yves 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 18.02.2013 um 18:54 schrieb James Turner <zakal...@mac.com>:
> 
>> 
>> On 18 Feb 2013, at 17:08, Curtis Olson <curtol...@flightgear.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I haven't been following this thread too closely, but is it possible to get 
>>> 10.5 support back into the official build on Jenkins or does it require a 
>>> separate build/installer for 10.5 support?
>>> 
>> 
>> I think the answer is no, since the build slave runs 10.6.
>> 
>> If someone else disagrees, then I need to proceed carefully, since 
>> rebuilding the slave if we screw something up is not fun. (I could image the 
>> drive, I guess)
>> 
>> James
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, 
>> is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly 
>> thought 
>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, 
>> whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most 
>> recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
>> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, 
> is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought 
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, 
> whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most 
> recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to