Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 08:54 -0500, Josh Babcock a écrit : > Dave Culp wrote: > > On Friday 04 November 2005 07:29 am, Josh Babcock wrote: > > > >>Additionally, this will also highlight planes that no one really cares > >>about. That way instead of ditching the incomplete planes, we can > >>instead ditch the ones that are incomplete and unwanted, then help bring > >>along the ones that people do want to fly. > > > > > > > > Ditch? This means they get kicked out of the FG hangar? Who decides? > > > > Dave > > > > > > I guess we take a vote. Hadn't thought about that. Point is, they only > go if they are unwanted. I'm not talking about taking away stuff that > people want. Besides, I also still believe that stuff should never be > taken out of CVS, maybe put into another tree to make it easier to not > check it out with the rest of base, but still keep it around. I was > talking in the context of the release packages. Maybe I misunderstood > the original discussion. > > Josh > Hi Josh, I do not fully agree with your idea (about vote) , each a/c is the result of a specific work, each one has his own place in FG, from the most funny to the most serious. The variety makes the advantage. I remember an old A/C with a Tux piloting, i worry it has vanished from FG. When you are talking about stuff what do you mean? Do you mean that FG team must define a standard with a specific minimum to be done, to be acceptable? do you mean a jury must decide if that a/c is good or not? where is freedom? The quality of FG is coming from the FDM, as far as i know every existing a/c are correctly defined.
Cheers -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
