Hi Guys
--- Josh Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess we take a vote. Hadn't thought about that.
> Point is, they only
> go if they are unwanted. I'm not talking about
> taking away stuff that
> people want. Besides, I also still believe that
> stuff should never be
> taken out of CVS, maybe put into another tree to
> make it easier to not
> check it out with the rest of base, but still keep
> it around. I was
> talking in the context of the release packages.
> Maybe I misunderstood
> the original discussion.
Just catching up on E-mail after 24 hours plus of
travelling (Isle of Wight to Corvallis, Oregon). I
guess what we could do is move them to an
old/incomplete aircraft "archive" area (sort of like
you say above). If anyone fancies continuing work on a
specific aircraft it could always be "re-activated"
and worked on some more later?
Paul
~~~~~
P.S. *Really* scary approach to PDX in a Q200 last night.
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
