Le mardi 22 novembre 2005 à 14:15 +0000, AJ MacLeod a écrit : > On Tuesday 22 November 2005 13:42, Dave Culp wrote: > > I have ignored the electrical system because, last time I looked, it is not > > suited for non-GA aircraft. > > Probably true for the XML system - the new nasal electrical system is capable > of simulating pretty much anything as far as I can see, because it's > completely extensible. > > On the downside, to get a decent result from the nasal system requires a bit > more knowledge both of programming and electrical systems. Neither of which > have ever been my strong points, although I'm slowly making some headway with > it... I see no reason so far that someone with skills in both those areas > couldn't produce a very believable system, even for fairly complex aircraft. > Syd Adams has done some nice work in this area I think... > > Cheers, > > AJ > Oh, just for experiment i tried to use the existing nasal electrical (c172) mainly for Crusader, i found differences, and xml seems to be better. BTW: we get /systems/electrical/amps=-15 instead of -30 => not better
Cheers -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
