On Tuesday 22 November 2005 14:38, Gerard ROBIN wrote: > Oh, just for experiment i tried to use the existing nasal electrical > (c172) mainly for Crusader, i found differences, and xml seems to be > better. > BTW: we get /systems/electrical/amps=-15 instead of -30 => not better
Yeah, I'm not holding the 172's implementation of a nasal electrical system as any kind of ideal (actually, I don't like it very much, although I don't claim to be able to produce anything significantly better). Really what I'm saying is; as far as I can see, the nasal electrical system in general has the potential to model pretty much anything you can imagine _if_ you have the programming skills / electrical knowledge to implement it. Sadly the electrical engineering I did at university was one of my most despised subjects and I don't seem to have retained very much of it... I freely admit I'm still very much at the "getting to grips" stage with the nasal system myself :-) Cheers, AJ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
