Fabien Costantini wrote: > fltk.development > Ok, If we agree that we put the the api comments in the sources cxx files
I apologise for butting in here, but I'm not sure if this has been addressed. If the doxygen comments are in the source files, then a user who installed FLTK via RPMs (e.g. fltk-1.3.0-6190, fltk-devel-1.3.0-6190) cannot refer to the installed header files for documentation? Presumably, this doesn't matter I guess since in this case, the rpm would have most likely installed the documentation files (eg. html -> /usr/share/doc/fltk.) as well. If this was discussed before, what was the reason for putting the doxygen comments in the cxx files? I'm just curious as I tend to put them in the headers files and I'm wondering if I should switch too. Thanks, -- Alvin _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
