> > OK. I know I said I was going to go work on something useful... Well, I > > lied. > > No, you didn't ;-) > > > I made a pretty set of Cairo-native boxtypes instead. Behold: > > > > http://non-mixer.tuxfamily.org/non-mixer-cairo-theme.png > > That was *very* useful! Looks really pretty good.
Yup - very pretty indeed... Great stuff. > May we use your code in FLTK (copyright), if we decide to add > Cairo drawing support, as you did? Yes, I guess we'd want agreement to use the fltk-style "LGPLv2 but with static linking allowed and derived widgets allowed" waivers - but I think the modified code is with the fltk license at present so that'd be OK? > Should we dump the Cairo > Window support we have now in favor of (your) full(?) Cairo > drawing? Yes, the existing fltk-1.x Cairo stuff only allows you to have a cairo surface inside a fltk window, in effect. If we have "cairo all the way down" then that would no longer make sense - though it might make sense in some other context potentially, though that is easily down in other ways; I quite often draw Cairo into a fltk window, but never use the baked-in Cairo support... So, I don't think we need it and it collides with the "new" cairo stuff, so let's think about removing it. (Is it even in fltk3 anyway? I guess not...) _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev