On 28.02.2013 04:47, Greg Ercolano wrote: > Would like to hear from Albrecht, Matt, and Mike on this as well.
Sorry, it's too late over here to reply now (with real content), but I have it on my to-do-list. Need some time to look at the different licenses, but OTOH, if Mike and Matt propose MIT (or say it's okay), then I'm probably okay with this, too. IANAL ;-) IIRC I haven't seen a real "freeware" (public domain) proposal. Wouldn't this be appropriate for the example code? And BTW, I could (maybe) see three different parts of source code in the lib that could be handled / licensed differently: (1) examples/* (2) test/* (3) documentation code The latter is currently probably in test/hello.cxx and maybe others, but could be different than, e.g. unittests, maybe more like the code in examples ? Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
