On 24 May 2011, at 21:57, Edzard Egberts wrote: > Marcel Dejean schrieb: >>> >> Is a FLTK 2 compatibility layer really necessary? FLTK 2 never reached a >> release version, so I wouldn't expect much demand for a compatibility layer.
Maybe, but there were some "interesting" users... at some point nuke, cinepaint and dillo were all using it. > When starting my new job, I took the most recent version of FLTK and I'm > just implementing the forth project with it. It's just a few months ago, > that I realised, FLTK 1.3 is not released yet... ups! Yea, but the point of the 1.x series has always been that it is stable, so who would know! ;-) _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
