Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome to sign it yourself until we make a decision.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck <ra...@tbalck.com> wrote: > > I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all > for signing. > > > On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" <jagregory....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Guys, > > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very > easy > > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I > > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our > > assemblies? > > > > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need > it > > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed > one. > > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any > > reasons we shouldn't be signing? > > > > James > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
