I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code easier, imho. Andy
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory <jagregory....@gmail.com>wrote: > Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone > currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome > to sign it yourself until we make a decision. > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck <ra...@tbalck.com> wrote: > >> >> I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all >> for signing. >> >> >> On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" <jagregory....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Guys, >> > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a >> very easy >> > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I >> > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our >> > assemblies? >> > >> > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need >> it >> > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed >> one. >> > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any >> > reasons we shouldn't be signing? >> > >> > James >> >> > > > > -- ================= I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral. http://www.i-nnovate.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
