Hi, Ben
Thanks for your efforts. Anyway, i recommend using the full tree patched because
somes minor comments haved been added in the source (only comments not code).
For the future , i will iterate the same way. This is by far the best method.
Please at the time of make command, be vigilant. Always save the result of the
build in a log.
It can be very useful in case of issue on RPi2. Really i dont' think you will
get issue!
As you are a monophonic player, you will able to evaluate the enhanced legato
modes.
your feedback is welcome.
regards
jjc
> Message du 14/08/16 01:29
> De : "Ben Gonzales"
> A : "FluidSynth mailing list"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [fluid-dev] New Patch 0003 - polymono - functionality
>
>Hi
>
> I edited the patch file to change the "\" to "/" in the filenames. I know I
> didn't need to because you have supplied the file tree, but I wanted to find
> out if that was the problem. Unfortunately I couldn't do a global search and
> replace as there are other "\"s that are valid.
>
> I can confirm that for the RPi, and I assume for all *nix platforms too, the
> change fixed the problem.
>
> The edited patch file is attached.
>
> Ben
>
>
On 13/08/16 21:39, Ceresa Jean-Jacques wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> To avoid difficulties applying this patch , now the
> PatchFluidPolyMono-0003.zip
> file contains the full tree already patched.
> https://sourceforge.net/p/fluidsynth/tickets/160/
>
> That means that if you intend to try this patch you only need to
> build the tree on your platform.
>
> As usual ,building steps are commands: cmake, make,...
>
> Regards
> jjc
>
>
>
> Message du 06/08/16 00:30
> > De : "Ceresa Jean-Jacques"
> > A : "FluidSynth mailing list"
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [fluid-dev] New Patch - polymono - functionality
> >
> >
> > Hi, Ben
> >
> > Please, have you try the command without --binary option ?
> >
> > patch -p2 < fluid-polymono-0003.patch
> >
> > jjc
> >
> >
> Message du 05/08/16 23:01
> > De : "Ben Gonzales"
> > A : fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [fluid-dev] New Patch - polymono - functionality
> >
> >Hi JJ.
> >
> > I tried the -p2 option before. It produced the same result as the -p1
> >
> > I think the issue is that on windows the file names look like this:
> >
> > ./fluidsynth-1.1.6\include\fluidsynth\synth.h
> >
> > but *nix needs the slashes to go the other way ( / ) like this:
> >
> > ./fluidsynth-1.1.6/include/fluidsynth/synth.h
> >
> > I looked at RL Horn's patch and that's what it was like.
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
> >
On 05/08/16 21:35, jean-jacques.ceresa wrote:
> >
Hi, Ben
> >
> > There are typos errors in the manual , i'am sorry
> >
> > 1) the -p options must be -p2.
> > 2) the --binary is necessary only when patching on Windows environnement
> > from a patch coming
> > from unix. In your case the situation is the reverse.
> >
> > On my platform (Windows) executing the command: patch -p2 <
> > fluid-polymono-0003.patch, works
> >
> > So please try :
> >
> > So after
> > - reading section 1.1.3 and
> > - renaming the "fluidsynth" directory to "fluidsynth-1.1.6" is not
> > necessary (as far we use -p options)
> > - putting the patch file into the directory, then
> > - moving to the directory, then run
> >
> > patch -p2 < fluid-polymono-0003.patch
> >
> > I hope it will work. If it is not the case, i will send the full tree
> > already patched.
> >
> > jjc
> >
> >
Le 05/08/2016 09:32, Ben Gonzales a écrit :
> >
Nope, didn't work..
> >
> > Perhaps the slashes are the wrong way for a *nix environment?
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
On 05/08/16 16:25, Kjetil Matheussen wrote:
> >
Hi,
> >
Seems like you need to use a different -p option, as the
error message suggests. Maybe -p2 or -p0 will work instead of -p1.
> >
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Ben Gonzales
wrote:
> >
Yes, sorry. The phrase "Read the manual" comes to mind...
> >
> > So after
> > - reading section 1.1.3 and
> > - renaming the "fluidsynth" directory to "fluidsynth-1.1.6", then
> > - putting the patch file into the directory, then
> > - moving to the directory, then
> > - issuing the patch command, I got:
> >
> > pi@ewipi:~/fluidsynth-1.1.6 $ patch -p1 --binary < fluid-polymono-0003.patch
> > can't find file to patch at input line 4
> > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |diff -Naur ./fluidsynth-1.1.6\include\fluidsynth\synth.h
> > ./fluid-polymono-0003\include\fluidsynth\synth.h
> > |--- ./fluidsynth-1.1.6\include\fluidsynth\synth.h Tue May 19 12:27:02
> > 2015
> > |+++ ./fluid-polymono-0003\include\fluidsynth\synth.h Sun Jul 31
> > 15:49:44 2016
> > --------------------------
> > File to patch: ^C
> >
> >
> > It can't find the file to patch.
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
> > On 04/08/16 19:54, jean-jacques.ceresa wrote:
> >
Hi Ben,
> > >To compile this patch, do I have to start from a base version of FS and
> > >then apply patch 3?
> > Yes, has explained in the the pdf (chapter 'how to apply this path'), one
> > need to start from FS version 1.1.6 git.
> >
> > 1) apply the patch as described in the pdf. The procedure is the same as
> > for previous patch.
> > 2) cmake than make. Anyway , always look at the result of the make and
> > verify that the library (libfluidsynth.so)
> > is build without errors. Only the library is concerned by this patch.
> >
> > To give you a quick try, you can run the tutorial commands files at the
> > console. Please read tutorials (part 2).
> >
> > >If I have applied the first patch, can I then apply patch3?
> > No, you cannot because this patch supersedes all previous patches.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > jjc
> >
> > Le 04/08/2016 09:01, Ben Gonzales a écrit :
> >
Hi Jean-Jacques.
> >
> > To compile this patch, do I have to start from a base version of FS and
> > then apply patch 3? If I have applied the first patch, can I then apply
> > patch3?
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > On 04/08/16 01:04, jean-jacques.ceresa wrote:
> >
Hi, Fluidsynth users
> >
> > Regardless the instruments you like to play (monophonic or polyphonic),
> > enhancements functionalities have be done for both.
> > You will find this on https://sourceforge.net/p/fluidsynth/tickets/160/
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > jjc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fluid-dev mailing list
> > fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fluid-dev mailing list
> > fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fluid-dev mailing list
> > fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fluid-dev mailing list
> > fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing list
> fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing list
> fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
> [ fluid-polymono-0003.patch (159.3 Ko) ]
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
