Hey Alistair and Tona, >> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem Ipsum >> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design. Since I was >> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be >> safe, so you should see everything there. > > Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are corrent, > and then I'll remove the old versions.
I mentioned this to Alistair earlier off-list, but just to be clear, we should try to create separate files in a separate directory for user-testing ready wireframes. Otherwise, it'll just become a clumsy mess of canvases (and it's already in need of cleanup!)--we want to be able to print up the user-testing ready wireframes without having to sift through working copies. >> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon" in >> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we have >> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with something? > > We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea if you > would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task, please > tell me. Given that this is still a relatively early user test, I think we can do without the icons for the home screen for this round. That said, I know I'm contradicting myself a bit because I encouraged the creation of a draft audio icon for the artifact view, but this is mainly because the artifact view was further along in maturity than the home screen. >> Other minor things that I thought of are... >> >> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this? Should there >> be no "me" comments when the user begins? > > Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me" comment. > But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that the > user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could be > interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the participant > after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really > understands it. Do you agree? Agreed. We should have two versions--one with "me" and one without. >> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view. Should I do >> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of the >> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually expanded >> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the >> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be overkill. I >> hope I didn't lose you with that question. > > We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and another > version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to have a > interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it be > technically feasible for this mockups' testing version? How about we do a compromise? One with all collapsed, another with all expanded, and four more with one of each expanded? _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
