The pictures are already up on the wiki as attachments on the testing
protocol page.
http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Mobile+user+testing+protocol
Just uploaded the picture of the label there as well.
Erin
On 24-Nov-09, at 9:36 AM, tona monjo wrote:
Great, thanks!
Tona
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:34 PM, James William Yoon <[email protected]
> wrote:
We did in fact--Erin prepared a picture of a sleigh and label
including standard tombstone information as well as the object code.
Erin, could you put these up on the wiki for Tona?
James
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]>
wrote:
James, preparing the documentation for tomorrow's test, I wonder if
you have used any picture of artifact with label and object code. If
you haven't, I will prepare one.
Thanks!
Tona
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> Thanks for your interest! I'm going to do two user testing
tomorrow (at our 3PM), and I'm printing today the wireframes to
prepare it. I think they are complete, but if I detect anything or
do some change, I'll tell you.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tona
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tona,
>>
>> I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you
>> have started already?) I was wondering if you needed anything
else in
>> the User Ready wireframes. Let me know if I can do anything to
help!
>> See you tonight in the design meeting
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Alistair,
>> >
>> > It would be interesting if you could also work on the
>> > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for
the user
>> > testing.
>> >
>> > We should also have a new version for
FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle and
>> > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work
on it after
>> > creating the 3 new artifact pages.
>> >
>> > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version
currently at
>> > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly).
>> >
>> > Thanks!!
>> >
>> > Tona
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Alistair,
>> >>
>> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the
wireframes, and
>> >> they really look much better with actual contents.
>> >>
>> >> I send you some comments below (in red):
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]
>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi James and Tona and all,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the
Lorem Ipsum
>> >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design.
Since I was
>> >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases
to be
>> >>> safe, so you should see everything there.
>> >>
>> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new
ones are
>> >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions.
>> >>>
>> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says
"icon" in
>> >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we
have
>> >>> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with
something?
>> >>
>> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good
idea if you
>> >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this
task, please
>> >> tell me.
>> >>>
>> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still
some
>> >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are
ready for
>> >>> the user tests. Much of it will involve some level of
coordinating
>> >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan. For example, I
still need to
>> >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able
to view,
>> >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation
plan.
>> >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock
solid yet,
>> >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still
quite
>> >>> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing
protocol during
>> >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should
revise the
>> >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap.
>> >>>
>> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are...
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this?
Should there
>> >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me"
comment.
>> >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could
assume that the
>> >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it
could be
>> >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the
participant
>> >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he
really
>> >> understands it. Do you agree?
>> >>>
>> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view.
Should I do
>> >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed +
each of the
>> >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually
expanded
>> >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of
the
>> >>> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be
overkill. I
>> >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question.
>> >>
>> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels
collapsed, and
>> >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these
panels, to have a
>> >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand.
Could it be
>> >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version?
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page. Does that
just show
>> >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on
that day?
>> >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text
with "Today
>> >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button
should
>> >>> be Today's Events instead of Events.
>> >>
>> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it
shows
>> >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events.
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the
"Exhibition"
>> >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that. Shouldn't all
they need
>> >>> to know be the running time? Or are they able to download to
download
>> >>> those items to their hard drive.
>> >>
>> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll
assimilate the
>> >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's
page for the
>> >> video and audio panel.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my
email! I'd
>> >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any
thoughts you
>> >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our
evaluation
>> >>> plan.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Alistair
>> >>> _______________________________________________________
>> >>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tona Monjo
>> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
>> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tona Monjo
> Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> http://www.tonamonjo.com
--
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
--
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
