Tona,
My sense is that you could have them read and sign if they'd like --
the primary reason to have that be part of the process is to make
clear that by testing they are participating in the community as a
volunteer.
Best,
Jess
On Nov 24, 2009, at 9:27 AM, tona monjo wrote:
James or Jess, I've another question: when doing user tests here, in
Barcelona, do we also have to make the user sign the Contributor
License Agreement?
Thanks!
Tona
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, tona monjo <[email protected]>
wrote:
James, preparing the documentation for tomorrow's test, I wonder if
you have used any picture of artifact with label and object code. If
you haven't, I will prepare one.
Thanks!
Tona
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> Thanks for your interest! I'm going to do two user testing
tomorrow (at our 3PM), and I'm printing today the wireframes to
prepare it. I think they are complete, but if I detect anything or
do some change, I'll tell you.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tona
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tona,
>>
>> I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you
>> have started already?) I was wondering if you needed anything
else in
>> the User Ready wireframes. Let me know if I can do anything to
help!
>> See you tonight in the design meeting
>>
>> Alistair
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Alistair,
>> >
>> > It would be interesting if you could also work on the
>> > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for
the user
>> > testing.
>> >
>> > We should also have a new version for
FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle and
>> > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work
on it after
>> > creating the 3 new artifact pages.
>> >
>> > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version
currently at
>> > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly).
>> >
>> > Thanks!!
>> >
>> > Tona
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Alistair,
>> >>
>> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the
wireframes, and
>> >> they really look much better with actual contents.
>> >>
>> >> I send you some comments below (in red):
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]
>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi James and Tona and all,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the
Lorem Ipsum
>> >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design.
Since I was
>> >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases
to be
>> >>> safe, so you should see everything there.
>> >>
>> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new
ones are
>> >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions.
>> >>>
>> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says
"icon" in
>> >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we
have
>> >>> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with
something?
>> >>
>> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good
idea if you
>> >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this
task, please
>> >> tell me.
>> >>>
>> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still
some
>> >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are
ready for
>> >>> the user tests. Much of it will involve some level of
coordinating
>> >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan. For example, I
still need to
>> >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able
to view,
>> >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation
plan.
>> >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock
solid yet,
>> >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still
quite
>> >>> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing
protocol during
>> >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should
revise the
>> >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap.
>> >>>
>> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are...
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this?
Should there
>> >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me"
comment.
>> >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could
assume that the
>> >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it
could be
>> >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the
participant
>> >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he
really
>> >> understands it. Do you agree?
>> >>>
>> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view.
Should I do
>> >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed +
each of the
>> >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually
expanded
>> >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of
the
>> >>> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be
overkill. I
>> >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question.
>> >>
>> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels
collapsed, and
>> >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these
panels, to have a
>> >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand.
Could it be
>> >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version?
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page. Does that
just show
>> >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on
that day?
>> >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text
with "Today
>> >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button
should
>> >>> be Today's Events instead of Events.
>> >>
>> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it
shows
>> >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events.
>> >>>
>> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the
"Exhibition"
>> >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that. Shouldn't all
they need
>> >>> to know be the running time? Or are they able to download to
download
>> >>> those items to their hard drive.
>> >>
>> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll
assimilate the
>> >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's
page for the
>> >> video and audio panel.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my
email! I'd
>> >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any
thoughts you
>> >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our
evaluation
>> >>> plan.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Alistair
>> >>> _______________________________________________________
>> >>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
>> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tona Monjo
>> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
>> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tona Monjo
> Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> http://www.tonamonjo.com
--
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
--
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
