Ross,
The fields are accepted, by that I mean they don't show the 'Index missing' sign but nothing appears in them. I'm obviously missing something, it may be in the way the records are constructed. I'm just not sure. The later record should show what was in the earlier record but something isn't right, obviously.

Lee

Ross Dickson wrote:
Lee,

I think what you're trying to do is a good way of meeting your data entry goals.

When you say the related fields just do not work, what do you mean? Are they just empty, or do they not exist? Can you enter some data in them, and see where it ends up in the related record?

Perhaps you could create a second window showing all the fields in your January record, which you can compare with the same layout for the August record. Then you can be sure that the calculated field used in the relationship is identical in both records.

Ross

Lee wrote:
Hi,
I've been travelling nicely on 8.5 for a while now, however, I've just had to rebuild an old program of mine from FM6 into 8.5 In the past all other rebuilds have been fine. However, on this occasion I've met a brick wall in one area. In the previous FM6 version I had a screen where a record was created in, say, January for a client and the data entered, when that client had a second entry made at a later date, in say August a self relationship would display on the right side of the August screen the data that was entered for this client on the January record. The self relationship was based on a calculated field of 2 other fields in that file. The same data fields were selected from the self relationship and placed on the right side of the screen thus showing what was entered on the previous January record. I have tried to do the same in 8.5 unfortunately while the self relationship field is working and looks the same on both the January and August record, the fields selected from that self relationship just do not work and display nothing.

The reason for doing this exercise is that it saves the operator having to search for the old record to compare data and then you don't have the same data on the same screen.

Any suggestions please or is there another way to achieve the same result.


Lee


--

Reply via email to