John, et al
I am interested in what you think are the better approach alternatives
to handle complexity and size (etc), what criteria should apply and why
one ranks higher than another.
For example, should a language support both actors and be model driven?
Is a mix of type inference and explicit typing with operators (like
OCAML) better than extremely late binding, and for what?
Should there be a hierarchy of syntax compatible languages, with
different restrictions, say extremely late binding at the top, and fully
typed and OS or device driver oriented at the bottom?
(ie pick the right tool in the family, size of hand held screwdriver up
to exchangeable bits for a power tool).
Thanks for your interesting references and insights.
Regards,
Gerry Jensen
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
